Carroll v. MjjM Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Supercuts
Filing
11
ORDER approving 9 Discovery Plan. Length of Trial 3-5 Days. Case Track: Standard. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante. Summary Judgment Motions due by 11/21/2013. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 11/19/2012. Mediation Follow Up on 9/16/2013.(dae)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Tammy Carroll
v.
Civil No. 12-cv-00269-JL
MjjM Enterprises,
d/b/a Supercuts
ORDER AFTER PRELIMINARY
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on
October 22, 2012.
The Discovery Plan (document no. 9) is approved as
submitted, with the following changes:
• Expert disclosure deadline -
60 days prior to final
pretrial conference
• Summary judgment deadline - 120 days prior to final
pretrial conference
• Jury trial - April, 2014
Summary Judgment.
The parties and counsel are advised that
compliance with Rule 56(e) and Local Rule 7.2(b), regarding
evidentiary support for factual assertions, and specification and
delineation of material issues of disputed fact, will be
required.
Oral argument on dispositive motions.
Counsel and the
parties should anticipate that oral argument will be held on all
dispositive motions.
Any party preferring that such a motion be
decided on the written filings alone should so notify the clerk.
Discovery disputes.
Discovery disputes will be handled by
the undersigned judge, as opposed to the Magistrate Judge, in the
normal course.
No motion to compel is necessary.
The party or
counsel seeking discovery-related relief should confer with
adverse counsel to choose mutually available dates, and then
contact the Deputy Clerk to schedule a conference call with the
court.
The court will inform counsel and parties what written
materials, if any, should be submitted in advance of the
conference call.
Customary motions to compel discovery, while disfavored by
the undersigned judge, are nonetheless permissible.
If counsel
prefer traditional discovery litigation to the conference call
procedure set forth above, any such motion to compel should
expressly request, in the title of the motion, a referral to the
United States Magistrate Judge.
normally be granted.
Such referral requests will
If the Magistrate Judge is recused,
alternate arrangements will be made.
2
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
United States District Judge
Dated:
cc:
October 22, 2012
James G. Noucas, Jr., Esq.
K. Joshua Gordon, Esq.
Debra Weiss Ford, Esq.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?