Bosonetto et al v. Richmond et al

Filing 17

ORDER granting 15 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Defendants Sandra Gillis and Town of Richmond shall file their response to the amended complaint within fourteen days of the date of this order. Plaintiffs shall serve Sean McElhiney with the amended complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, within twenty-one days of the date of this order. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(ko)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Nicolas Bosonetto, et al. v. Civil No. 12-cv-277-JL Town if Richmond, et al. ORDER The motion to amend and to add a party (doc. no. 15) is GRANTED, without prejudice to defendants' challenging the sufficiency of the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) or 12(c). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) (leave to amend is "freely" given). The First Circuit has not precluded section 1985(3) claims based on religious discrimination. See generally Romero-Barcelo v. Hernandez-Agosto, 75 F.3d 23, 34 (1st Cir. 1996). The clerk shall docket as filed on this date the amended complaint (doc. no. 15-2). Defendants Sandra Gillis and Town of Richmond shall file their response to the amended complaint within fourteen days of the date of this order. Plaintiffs shall serve Sean McElhiney with the amended complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, within twenty-one days of the date of this order. SO ORDERED. November 8, 2012 cc: Nicolas Bosonetto Jill Bosonetto Daniel J. Mullen, Esq. Joseph S. Hoppock, Esq. _________________________________ Landya B. McCafferty Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?