Gonzalez v. USA
ORDER Affirming the 21 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Motion for Clarification (ECF No. 19) is DENIED. Defendants Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE and the Petition is DISMISSED. Motion to Extend filed in 1:07-cr-00189-GZS-3 (ECF No. 693) is DISMISSED AS MOOT for reasons stated in footnote 1. So Ordered by Judge George Z. Singal.(ko)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended
Decision (ECF No. 21) filed March 12, 2013, the Recommended Decision is
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
(1) That Defendant’s Motion for Clarification (ECF No. 19) is DENIED;
(2) That Defendant’s Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED WITH
PREJUDICE and the Petition is DISMISSED;
(3) That a certificate of appealability shall not issue in the event Defendant files
an appeal because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c);
(4) Defendant’s Motion to Extend filed in 1:07-cr-00189-GZS-3 (ECF No. 693) is
DISMISSED AS MOOT for reasons stated in footnote 1.
_/s/ George Z. Singal
United States District Judge
Dated this 9th day of April, 2013.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?