Laser Projection Technologies, Inc. v. Ithal

Filing 12

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. ; approving 8 Report and Recommendation. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.(mm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Laser Projection Technologies, Inc. v. Case No. 12-cv-427-PB Kyle Ithal ORDER I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated November 8, 2012, no objection having been filed." '[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.''' School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). SO ORDERED. December 17, 2012 /s/ Paul Barbadoro Paul Barbadoro United States District Judge cc: Counsel of Record

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?