Laser Projection Technologies, Inc. v. Ithal
Filing
16
ORDER/Judgment for permanent injunction So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.(mm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
LASER PROJECTION TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
KYLE ITHAL,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Docket No. 12-cv-00427
JUDGMENT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
In accordance with the Court’s Report and Recommendation dated November 8,
2012, which has been adopted by the Court, the Court ORDERS:
1.
For a period of fifteen months running from the date of Defendant Kyle
Ithal’s (“Ithal”) departure from Plaintiff Laser Projection Technologies, Inc. (“LPT”),
that is through and including January 19, 2014, Ithal shall not induce or attempt to induce
any person which was a customer of LPT or any of its subsidiaries, or which otherwise
was a contracting party with LPT or any of its subsidiaries, as of the date of Ithal’s
departure from LPT, to terminate any written or oral agreement or understanding with
LPT or any of its subsidiaries; and
2.
Ithal shall not, at any time, disclose any of LPT’s trade secrets or
confidential company information, which is defined to mean all information used by LPT
and not generally known, whether or not marked “confidential.”
3.
Ithal shall not otherwise violate the terms of the Non-Competition, NonDisclosure, and Assignment of Inventions Agreement made as of October 1, 2007
between LPT and Ithal.
4.
This Order shall stay in effect unless and until its is modified by the Court
upon application of one or both of the parties.
4816-7406-0817.2
5.
The Court retains jurisdiction of this matter and over Ithal to ensure
compliance with the terms of this Order.
SO ORDERED, this ___ day of ______________, 2013
29
January
_____________________________
/s/ Paul Barbadoro
Barbadoro, J.
United States District Court
District of New Hampshire
cc:
4816-7406-0817.2
Counsel of Record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?