Lintner et al v. Bank of New York, Mellon et al

Filing 17

ORDER approving (with changes) 15 Discovery Plan. Length of Trial 4 days. Case Track: Standard. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante. Summary Judgment Motions due by 10/15/2013. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 5/1/2013. Close of Discovery deadline 10/15/2013. Joint Mediation Statement due by 8/15/2013.(cmp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE James Lintner, et al. v. Civil No. 12-cv-00462-JL Bank of New York Mellon, et al. ORDER AFTER PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on January 29, 2013. The Discovery Plan (document no. 15) is approved as submitted, with the following changes: • Close of discovery - October 15, 2013 • Expert discovery Plaintiff’s expert disclosure - August 1, 2013 Defendant’s expert disclosure - September 1, 2013 Supplement to expert reports - October 1, 2013 • Summary judgment deadline - October 15, 2013 • Jury trial - March, 2014 Based on the discussions between the court and counsel at the conference, the following are stricken without prejudice to being reinstated on request if warranted by the evidence: • the following affirmative defenses: Bank of New York Mellon - Third, Fourth, Seventh and Eighth Saxon - Fourth Defendant Bank of New York Mellon will amend ¶¶ 4, 7, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 20 of its Answer to clearly indicate its position with respect to the corresponding allegation(s) of the complaint. Defendant Saxon will amend ¶¶ 7, 11, 12, 15, 19, and 20. Summary Judgment. The parties and counsel are advised that compliance with Rule 56(e) and Local Rule 7.2(b), regarding evidentiary support for factual assertions, and specification and delineation of material issues of disputed fact, will be required. Oral argument on dispositive motions. Counsel and the parties should anticipate that oral argument will be held on all dispositive motions. Any party preferring that such a motion be decided on the written filings alone should so notify the clerk. Discovery disputes. Discovery disputes will be handled by the undersigned judge, as opposed to the Magistrate Judge, in the normal course. No motion to compel is necessary. The party or counsel seeking discovery-related relief should confer with adverse counsel to choose mutually available dates, and then contact the Deputy Clerk to schedule a conference call with the 2 court. The court will inform counsel and parties what written materials, if any, should be submitted in advance of the conference call. Customary motions to compel discovery, while disfavored by the undersigned judge, are nonetheless permissible. If counsel prefer traditional discovery litigation to the conference call procedure set forth above, any such motion to compel should expressly request, in the title of the motion, a referral to the United States Magistrate Judge. normally be granted. Such referral requests will If the Magistrate Judge is recused, alternate arrangements will be made. SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Joseph N. Laplante United States District Judge Dated: cc: January 29, 2013 David H. Bownes, Esq. Joshua D. Shakun, Esq. John A. Houlihan, Esq. Alexander G. Henlin, Esq. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?