Cheney v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

Filing 13

ORDER (Corrected): The matter is stayed for 90 days to facilitate a settlement, which counsel represented would like involve a "deed in lieu of foreclosure" or similar disposition. Status reports due as outlined. Bench (instead of jury) trial July 2014. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(dae)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Sharon Cheney
v.

Civil No. 12-cv-465-JL

CitiMortgage, Inc.

ORDER AFTER PRELIMINARY
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on
July 2, 2013.
The matter is stayed for 90 days to facilitate a settlement,
which counsel represented would like involve a “deed in lieu of
foreclosure” or similar disposition.

Status reports due on

August 2, 2013, September 3, 2013 and October 2, 2013.
The Discovery Plan and schedule is as follows:
• Plaintiff’s expert disclosure - November 29, 2013
• Defendants’ Expert disclosure - December 30, 2013
• Expert Report Supplementation - January 14, 2014
• Expert Challenges - March 20, 2014
• Motions for summary judgment - February 14, 2014
• Bench trial - July, 2014
Summary Judgment.

The parties and counsel are advised that

compliance with Rule 56(e) and Local Rule 7.2(b), regarding
evidentiary support for factual assertions, and specification and

delineation of material issues of disputed fact, will be
required.
Oral argument on dispositive motions.

Counsel and the

parties should anticipate that oral argument will be held on all
dispositive motions.

Any party preferring that such a motion be

decided on the written filings alone should so notify the clerk.
Discovery disputes.

Discovery disputes will be handled by

the undersigned judge, as opposed to the Magistrate Judge, in the
normal course.

No motion to compel is necessary.

The party or

counsel seeking discovery-related relief should confer with
adverse counsel to choose mutually available dates, and then
contact the Deputy Clerk to schedule a conference call with the
court.

The court will inform counsel and parties what written

materials, if any, should be submitted in advance of the
conference call.
Customary motions to compel discovery, while disfavored by
the undersigned judge, are nonetheless permissible.

If counsel

prefer traditional discovery litigation to the conference call
procedure set forth above, any such motion to compel should
expressly request, in the title of the motion, a referral to the
United States Magistrate Judge.
normally be granted.

Such referral requests will

If the Magistrate Judge is recused,

alternate arrangements will be made.

2

SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
United States District Judge
Dated:
cc:

July 8, 2013

Cory R. Mattocks, Esq.
Jeremy A. Miller, Esq.
Joshua William Gardner, Esq.
Alexander G. Henlin, Esq.

3