Gosselin v. Kench, et al
Filing
11
/// ORDER approving 9 Report and Recommendation; dismissing 1 Complaint (document nos. 1, 5 and 7). So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
John J. Gosselin
v.
Case N o . 12-cv-514-SM
Christopher Kench, et a l .
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report
and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B . McCafferty dated
June 7 , 2013.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections
to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court
and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union N o . 37 v . United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 5 5 4 , 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v . Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 2 7 1 , 275 (1st Cir.1988));
see also United States v .
Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4 , 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
Plaintiff’s claims and all defendants named in the complaint
(document nos. 1 , 5 , and 7 ) are hereby dismissed.
Plaintiff’s
federal claims are also dismissed with prejudice for failure to state
a claim; his state law claims are dismissed without prejudice to allow
him to raise those claims in the state courts. The Clerk of Court
shall enter judgment in accordance with this order and close the case.
SO ORDERED.
n____p
r r
cAuliffe
tes District Judge
Date: June 2 6 , 2013
cc:
John J. Gosselin, pro se
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?