Polansky v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner, et al
ORDER granting 84 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 92 Motion for Summary Judgment; approving 114 Report and Recommendation. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.(mm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Civil No. 12-cv-105-PB
Department of Corrections, et al
O R D E R
After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith
approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B.
McCafferty dated March 25, 2013.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to
review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection
are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins.
Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary
of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also
United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after
proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's
report will waive the right to appeal).
/S/ Paul Barbadoro
United States District Judge
Date: April 4, 2013
Christopher Polansky, Pro Se
Lynmarie Cusack, Esq.
Jonathan Lax, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?