Runyon v. Lee et al

Filing 6

ORDER granting 5 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis as to Fred Runyon, initial fee of $-0-. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.Finance Follow Up Deadline 10/5/2012(lml)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Fred Runyon v. Civil No. 12-cv-290-PB FNU Lee, et al. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS The plaintiff, an inmate at Hillsborough County Department of Corrections (“Institution”), has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the above-captioned case and a certificate signed by an authorized individual from the Institution indicating a balance on the account of $0. Plaintiff has also submitted a signed consent form indicating consent to permit inmate accounts to make court-ordered payments on his behalf. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. While 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) requires the court assess an initial filing fee, given the plaintiff’s current balance is $0 there shall be no initial filing fee assessed. Going forward, however, the plaintiff shall be responsible for monthly payments of 20% of each preceding month’s income credited to his account, which shall be remitted by the Institution when the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). . The initial partial filing fee, and monthly payments thereafter as outlined above, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of Court by the Institution in accordance with this Order. A copy of this Order, along with a copy of the signed Prisoner Consent Form (doc. no. 5), shall be forwarded by the Court to the Institutions inmate account department. SO ORDERED. _____________________________ Landya B. McCafferty United States Magistrate Judge Dated: August 6, 2012 cc: Fred Runyon, pro se Inmate Accounts, Hillsborough County Department of Corrections

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?