Perfetto v. Alexis et al

Filing 37

///ORDER approving 34 Report and Recommendation; approving 11 Report and Recommendation. Case Dismissed. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(cmp)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Jonathan Andrew Perfetto
v.

Civil No. 12-cv-393-JL

Alexis et al

O R D E R
While the plaintiff has filed an (untimely) objection requesting that
the court disregard his notice of withdrawal, he maintains that he is still
not in a position to make meaningful substantive filings in response to
court orders and adverse filings. As Judge McCafferty's Report and
Recommendation recommends a dismissal without prejudice, its proposed
course of action remains the best course.

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the
Reports and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated
December 6, 2013. Additionally, No objection having been filed, I herewith
approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B.
McCafferty dated May 21, 2013. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the
objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district
court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir.
2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271,
275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d
4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific
objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
Chief Judge
Date: December 27, 2013
cc:

John A. Curran, Esq.
Jonathan Andrew Perfetto, Pro se