Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. G4 Communications Corporation

Filing 40

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion to Stay. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Brandywine Communications
Technologies, LLC
v.

Civil No. 13-cv-017-LM

G4 Communications Corporation
O R D E R
On July 2, 2013, the court heard oral argument on a motion
to stay filed by plaintiff Brandywine Communications
Technologies, LLC (“Brandywine”), document no. 26.
issued its ruling orally from the bench.

The court

This order briefly

summarizes that ruling.
The motion to stay is granted in part and denied in part.
The motion is denied to the extent that G4 Communications
Corporation (“G4”) may brief, on an expedited basis, its
licensing defense arising under the RPX Licensing Agreement
(doc. no. 32-2).

Brandywine shall have fourteen days from the

date that G4 files its brief to file a response.

The briefs

shall be no longer than twenty pages.
Additionally, Brandywine is ordered, on or before July 9,
2013, to respond to G4’s inquiries to Brandywine’s counsel, Lei
Sun, Esq., on June 13, 2013 (by telephone) and June 27, 2013 (by
letter), seeking information about the basis (independent of the

parties’ settlement discussions) of Brandywine’s knowledge of
G4’s allegedly patent-infringing equipment.
With the exception of the limited briefing the court is
permitting on G4’s licensing defense, as detailed above, the
motion to stay is granted.
SO ORDERED.

_______________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge
July 3, 2013
cc:

Timothy Devlin, Esq.
Brian D. Gross, Esq.
Jamie N. Hage, Esq.
Anthony L. Miele, Esq.
A. Robert Ruesch, Esq.
Timothy R. Shannon, Esq.
Lei Sun, Esq.

2