Cheney v. Harwood et al
Filing
3
ORDER granting 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Financial Affidavit, Custodial Certificate, and Prisoner Consent Form filed by Michael G. Cheney, initial fee of $83.49. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch.Finance Follow Up Deadline 4/22/2013(jeb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Michael G. Cheney
v.
Civil No. 13-cv-67-JD
Wade Harwood, et al.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS
The plaintiff, an inmate at New Hampshire State Prison for Men (“Institution”), has filed a
motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the above-captioned case, which is accompanied by a
certificate signed by an authorized individual from the Institution. The certificate evidences that
over the last six months, the plaintiff’s average deposits have been $292.68 and the plaintiff’s
average monthly balance has been $417.46. Plaintiff has also submitted a signed consent form
indicating consent to permit inmate accounts to make court-ordered payments on his behalf.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; however, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(b)(1), an initial filing fee is assessed in the amount of $83.49. In addition, monthly
payments of 20% of each preceding month’s income credited to the plaintiff’s account shall be
remitted by the Institution when the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the sum of $350.00
has been paid. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
The initial partial filing fee, and monthly payments thereafter as outlined above, shall be
forwarded to the Clerk of Court by the Institution in accordance with this Order. A copy of this
Order, along with a copy of the signed Prisoner Consent Form (doc. no. 2), shall be forwarded by
the Court to the Institutions inmate account department.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Daniel J. Lynch
Daniel J. Lynch
United States Magistrate Judge
Dated: February 19, 2013
cc: Michael G. Cheney, pro se
New Hampshire State Prison Inmate Accounts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?