Mezri v. US Attorney General, et al.

Filing 11

ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS: Because good cause exists to prohibit a nonparty from obtaining remote electronic access to documents, the clerk shall limit remote access to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 with attachments and, 2 Motion for Release from Detention Pursuant to Zadvydas v. Davis, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(jeb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Hacene Mezri
v.

Civil No. 1:13-cv-237-SM

US Attorney General, et al

ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS
The [1] Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
2241 with attachments and, [2] Motion for Release from Detention Pursuant
to Zadvydas v. Davis, filed in the above-captioned case contains one or
more personal identifiers listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a).

Making this

information available over the Internet may result in personal or financial
harm to the person whose personal information is contained in the referenced
documents.

Therefore, because good cause exists to prohibit a nonparty

from obtaining remote electronic access to documents , the clerk shall limit
remote access to [1] Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 with attachments and, [2] Motion for Release from Detention Pursuant
to Zadvydas v. Davis, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Landya B. McCafferty
Landya B. McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge
Date: May 21, 2013
cc:

Hacene Mezri, pro se