Widi v. Strafford County et al

Filing 47

ORDER approving 44 Report and Recommendation; approving 45 Report and Recommendation; denying 25 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying without prejudice 32 Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(dae)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE David J. Widi, Jr. v. Civil No. 13-cv-536-SM Strafford County, et al. O R D E R No objections having been filed, I herewith approve the Reports and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated June 18, 2015, for the reasons set forth therein (document nos. 44 and 45). Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (document no. 25) is hereby denied. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (document no. 32) is denied without prejudice. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge Date: July 17, 2015 cc: David J. Widi, Jr., pro se Corey M. Belobrow, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?