Flores v. US Attorney General et al
Filing
14
/// ORDER approving 13 Report and Recommendation; dismissing the 1 Complaint. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Eric Flores
v.
Case N o . 13-cv-1-SM
United States Attorney General, et a l .
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report
and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B . McCafferty dated
June 2 0 , 2013, for the reasons set forth on the record.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and
those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union N o . 37 v . United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 5 5 4 , 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v . Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 2 7 1 , 275 (1st Cir.1988));
see also United States v .
Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4 , 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
Plaintiff’s complaint (document n o . 1 ) is hereby dismissed.
The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this order
and close the case.
SO ORDERED.
_iffe
^
es District Judge
Date: June 2 0 , 2013
cc:
Eric Flores, pro se
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?