Kelly v. Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al

Filing 19

/// ORDER approving 9 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs Fourteenth Amendment claims asserted against Superintendent Dowaliby and Sheriff Dubois are hereby dismissed. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Howard D. Kelly v. Case N o . 13-cv-107-SM Warren Dowaliby et a l . O R D E R No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B . McCafferty dated June 3 , 2013, for the reasons set forth therein. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union N o . 37 v . United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v . Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v . Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4 , 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment claims asserted against Superintendent Dowaliby and Sheriff Dubois are hereby dismissed. Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment medical care claims against Nurse Practitioner Tracy Warren, and Medical Technicians Rebecca Eischen and Dawn Dow will go forward. SO ORDERED. Date: July 2 2 , 2013 cc: Howard D. Kelly, pro se

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?