Pickens v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al

Filing 30

/// ORDER approving 23 Report and Recommendation. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Ivan Mosi Pickens v. Case No. 14-cv-28-SM Commissioner, NH Department of Corrections, et al. O R D E R No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated September 9, 2014, for the reasons set forth therein. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). All claims asserted against the defendants in their official capacities are hereby dismissed. All claims against defendants Landry, Wrenn, Masse and the Acting NCF Warden/John Doe 1 are hereby dismissed, and those defendants are also dismissed as defendants from this case. The case will proceed on Claim 1 (Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim) against defendant Oliver and Claim 2 (Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim) against defendants Baker, King and John Doe 3. SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge Date: October 2, 2014 cc: Ivan Mosi Pickens, pro se Nancy J. Smith, Esq. Lynmarie C. Cusack, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?