Hilario v. FCI Berlin, Warden

Filing 17

/// ORDER approving 14 Report and Recommendation dismissing without prejudice 1 Petition for a Writ of Mandamus; denying as moot 5 Motion to Request a "Constitutional Jury"; denying as moot 16 Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Jose Miguel Hilario v. Case No. 14-cv-342-SM FCI Berlin, Warden O R D E R No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated December 10, 2015, for the reasons set forth therein. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). Mr. Hilario’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (document no. 1) is dismissed without prejudice to his ability to file a § 2255 motion in the District of Rhode Island. Petitioner’s Motion to Request a Constitutional Jury (document no. 5) and Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing (document no. 16) are both denied as moot. SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge Date: January 6, 2015 cc: Jose Miguel Hilario, pro se

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?