Plasencia et al v. Lang et al

Filing 29

ORDER approving 28 Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Johnstone; denying 16 Motion to Reopen Case, denying as moot 17 Motion to Extend Time, denying as moot 20 Motion to Amend; denying 23 Motion to Reopen Case. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(jbw) Modified on 8/17/2017 to correct docket text. (jbw).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Robinson Plasencia and v. Case No. 15-cv-249-LM Michael K. Lang et al. O R D E R No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated July 24, 2017, for the reasons set forth therein. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). The Plaintiffs’ motions to reopen the case are hereby denied (document nos. 16, 23), and their other pending motions to extend trial date and to amend complaint (document nos. 17, 20) are hereby denied as moot. SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Landya B. McCafferty United States District Judge Date: August 16, 2017 cc: Robinson Plasencia, pro se Indramira Plasencia, pro se Brian J.S. Cullen, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?