Beers v. NH Governor et al

Filing 95

/// ORDER approving 59 Report and Recommendation, denying 49 Motion to Amend Complaint to add additional claims against defendants Wrenn, Forbes, Kench, Foster, Gerry and an unnamed John Doe defendant. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jbw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Timothy Beers v. Case No. 15-cv-454-SM NH Governor, et al. O R D E R No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated March 8, 2017, for the reasons set forth therein (document no. 59). “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint (document no. 49) is hereby denied to the extent Mr. Beers seeks to add claims against defendants Wrenn, Forbes, Kench, Foster, Gerry and an unnamed John Doe defendant. SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge Date: September 26, 2017 cc: Timothy Beers, pro se Francis C. Fredericks, Esq. Lynmarie C. Cusack, Esq. Seth M. Zoracki, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?