Rubisch et al v. NH Department of Corrections

Filing 23

/// ORDER approving 22 Report and Recommendation, dismissing 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing 17 MOTION to Extend Deadline; dismissing 18 MOTION to Amend Complaint; dismissing 19 Motion to Dismiss. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(jbw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Christopher John Rubisch v. Case No. 15-cv-9-LM New Hampshire Department of Corrections O R D E R No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated September 15, 2015, for the reasons set forth therein. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). This case is dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. The court further dismisses all pending motions for summary judgment (doc. no. 14), to extend deadline (doc. no. 17, to amend complaint (doc. no. 18), and to dismiss (doc. no. 19). The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this order and close the case. SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Landya B. McCafferty United States District Judge Date: October 13, 2015 cc: Christopher John Rubisch, pro se

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?