Rubisch v. NH Department of Corrections
Filing
20
///ORDER approving 19 Report and Recommendation, recommending case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute, and; dismissing 14 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing 15 Motion to Extend Time ; dismissing 16 Motion to Amend. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(cmp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Christopher John Rubish
v.
Civil No. 15-cv-31-JL
NH Department of Corrections
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated September 15, 2015.
“‘[O]nly those issues
fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are
subject to review in the district court and those not preserved
by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No.
37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. ValenciaCopete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
Chief Judge
Date: October 7, 2015
cc:
Christopher John Rubisch, pro se
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?