Doiron v. Byrd et al
Filing
7
///ORDER approving 4 Report and Recommendation re 1 Complaint, recommending the district judge should dismiss all of the claims asserted in Doiron's complaint except his claim alleging a violation of his right to privacy in his medical information as outlined. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/23/2016: # 1 Signed Order) (jb).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Arthur Doiron
v.
Civil No. 16-cv-327-JL
Cammie Byrd, et al.
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated October 26, 2016.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. ValenciaCopete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
United States District Judge
Date: December 21, 2016
cc:
Arthur Doiron, pro se
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?