Coleman v. State of New Hampshire

Filing 91

ORDER approving 82 Report and Recommendation- denying 61 Motion to Amend; denying as moot 71 Motion to Dismiss. No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge And rea K. Johnstone dated April 3, 2018, and deny Coleman's motion to amend (doc. no. 61), and deny as moot Coleman's motion to dismiss Dronsfield's objection to the motion to amend (doc. no. 71). So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(js)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Richard Coleman
v.

Case No. 16-cv-498-LM

State of New Hampshire, et al.

O R D E R

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated April 3, 2018, and deny Coleman’s motion to amend
(doc. no. 61), and deny as moot Coleman’s motion to dismiss
Dronsfield’s objection to the motion to amend (doc. no. 71).
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court
and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on
appeal.’”

School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617

F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of
Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see
also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir.
1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection
to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States District Judge
Date: April 30, 2018
cc: Richard Coleman, pro se
Matthew Vernon Burrows, Esq.
Charles P. Bauer, Esq.