Mottram et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
ORDER approving 13 Report and Recommendation. The plaintiffs request for a preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.(vln)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Stacey Mottram, et al
Civil No. 16-cv-546-PB
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated March 10, 2017.
The plaintiffs’ request for a
preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice. “‘[O]nly
those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's
report are subject to review in the district court and those not
preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human
Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United
States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after
proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to
magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
/s/ Paul Barbadoro
Hon. Paul Barbadoro
United States District Court
Date: March 28, 2017
Stacey Mottram, pro se
Darrin M. Mottram, pro se
Joseph Patrick Kennedy, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?