Mottram et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA

Filing 15

ORDER approving 13 Report and Recommendation. The plaintiffs request for a preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.(vln)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Stacey Mottram, et al v. Civil No. 16-cv-546-PB Wells Fargo Bank, NA O R D E R No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated March 10, 2017. The plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). SO ORDERED. ____________________________ /s/ Paul Barbadoro Hon. Paul Barbadoro United States District Court Date: March 28, 2017 cc: Stacey Mottram, pro se Darrin M. Mottram, pro se Joseph Patrick Kennedy, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?