Tompson v. Fisher

Filing 7

///ORDER approving 5 Report and Recommendation, dismissing plaintiff's Claims 1(D)(iii), 3, 4, 5 and 6, and denying plaintiff's request for a declaratory judgment re: 26 U.S.C. Section 6334(1)(13)(B). So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(ko) Modified on 4/24/2017 to add:/// (ko).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Judith Tompson v. Case No. 17-cv-69-SM David Fisher O R D E R No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated March 23, 2017, for the reasons set forth therein. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). Plaintiff’s Claims 1(d)(iii), 3, 4, 5, and 6 are hereby dismissed. Plaintiff’s request for a declaratory judgment regarding the applicability of 26 U.S.C. § 6334(a)(13)(B) is hereby denied. SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge Date: April 22, 2017 cc: Judith Thompson, pro se

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?