Lath v. Manchester, NH, City of

Filing 15

ORDER approving 8 Report and Recommendation, recommending that the district judge dismiss the second amended complaint without prejudice, and deny the motion for writs of attachment without prejudice. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(cmp)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Mr Sanjeev Lath
v.

Case No. 17-cv-75-JL

City of Manchester

O R D E R

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated May 9, 2017.

“‘[O]nly those issues fairly

raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.’”

School Union No. 37 v.

United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. ValenciaCopete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).

SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
Chief Judge

Date: June 1, 2017
cc:

Sanjeev Lath, pro se
Michael B. O'Shaughnessy, Esq.
Robert J. Meagher, Esq.