Eisenberg v. US Social Security Administration
Filing
14
///ORDER approving 13 Report and Recommendation granting 11 Motion for Reconsideration and 3 Motion to Dismiss. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Leeland Eisenberg
v.
Case No. 17-cv-122-JL
United States Social Security
Administration
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated February 5, 2018.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. ValenciaCopete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
United States District Judge
Date: March 2, 2018
cc:
Leeland Eisenberg, pro se
Robert J. Rabuck, AUSA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?