Dionne v. Shulkin et al
///ORDER approving 4 Report and Recommendation, dismissing plaintiff's claims under RICO, the Fourteenth Amendment, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and dropping defendant Shulkin from this case. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.(js)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Civil No. 17-cv-142-PB
David Shulkin, et al.
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated May 2, 2017, dismiss plaintiff’s claims under
RICO, the Fourteenth Amendment, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and drop
defendant Shulkin from this case.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. ValenciaCopete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
/s/ Paul Barbadoro
United States District Judge
Date: May 30, 2017
Paul Dionne, pro se
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?