Green v. YouTube, Inc. et al

Filing 107

///ORDER denying 18 Motion for Hearing ; denying as moot 24 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying as moot 25 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 4 EX-PARTE EMERGENCY MOTION ; deny ing as moot 45 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 48 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 68 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 78 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 79 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 80 Motion to Stay; denying 9 MOTION to Reinstate & Allow Lawful Access ; denying as moot 103 Motion to Dismiss; approving 106 Report and Recommendation. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.(vln)

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-00203-PB Document 107 Filed 03/29/19 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Isaac Green Case No. 18-cv-203-PB v. YouTube, Inc., et al. ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated March 13, 2019, and dismiss the FAC (Doc. No. 104) in its entirety, deny Green’s requests for preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. Nos. 4, 9, 18), and deny as moot defendants’ pending dispositive motions (Doc. Nos. 24, 25, 45, 48, 68, 78, 79, 103) and motion to stay (Doc. No. 80). “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to Case 1:18-cv-00203-PB Document 107 Filed 03/29/19 Page 2 of 2 magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). /s/Paul Barbadoro ____________________________ Paul Barbadoro United States District Judge Date: March 29, 2019 cc: Isaac Green, pro se

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?