Woodham v. Woodham et al

Filing 35

///ORDER approving 27 Report and Recommendation. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(ko) Modified on 3/10/2025 to add: ///(ko).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Grace Woodham
v.

Case No. 23-cv-255-JL-AJ

Janet Woodham, et al.
ORDER
After due consideration of the objection filed by plaintiff’s
counsel, Alexandra Cote, and there being no objection filed by Ms.
Woodham’s co-guardians, Janet Woodham and Robert Woodham, I herewith
approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated October 2, 2024.

“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised

by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in
the district court and those not preserved by such objection are
precluded on appeal.’”

School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,

617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of
Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also
United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after
proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's
report will waive the right to appeal).
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
United States District Judge
Date: March 10, 2025
cc:

Counsel of Record