Natarelli v. US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
Filing
10
///ORDER granting 6 Motion to Reverse Decision of Commissioner; denying 7 Motion to Affirm Decision of Commissioner; approving 9 Report and Recommendation. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(lw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Demianna Natarelli
v.
Case No. 23-cv-542-SM-AJ
US Social Security Administration,
Acting Commissioner
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated April 22,
2024, for the reasons set forth therein. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to
review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection
are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins.
Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary
of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also
United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after
proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's
report will waive the right to appeal).
So Ordered.
____________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: May 8, 2024
cc:
Counsel of Record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?