SPETH v. GOODE, et al

Filing 229

ORDERED that Pltf's request for deferral of the due date for Pltfs opposition to Defts motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART, etc. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 8/9/2012. (drw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

HONORABLE JEROME B. SIMANDLE

CLAUS PETER SPETH,
Plaintiff,

Civil No. 95-0264 (JBS/AMD)
v.
ROBERT GOODE, et al.,
ORDER
Defendants.

This matter having come before the Court upon Defendants’ motion
for summary judgment [Docket Item 207] and Plaintiff’s application
under Rule 56(d) [Docket Item 214]; the Court having considered the
submissions of the parties in support thereof and opposition thereto;
for the reasons stated in the Opinion of today’s date; and for good
cause shown;
IT IS this

9th

day of

August

, 2012 hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for deferral of the due date
for Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary
judgment is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and it is
further
ORDERED that, if the Magistrate Judge determines that Plaintiff
is entitled to additional discovery upon the pending privilege motion
[Docket Item 203], Plaintiff’s opposition will be due fourteen (14)
days after discovery is provided.

However, if the Magistrate Judge

denies additional discovery in the pending privilege motion,
Plaintiff’s opposition will be due fourteen (14) days after entry
of the Magistrate Judge’s decision; Plaintiff should be prepared to
meet this deadline because no further extension will be granted.

s/ Jerome B. Simandle
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Chief U.S. District Judge

2