HARRIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al

Filing 15

ORDER REOPENING CASE; ORDERED that this Court's October 6, 2005 Opinion and Order denying the writ in this matter are VACATED; ORDERED that the petition is granted in part; ORDERED that this matter is referred to Respondents for further consideration. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 2/16/06. (sb)

Download PDF
HARRIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al Doc. 15 Case 1:05-cv-00323-RBK Document 15 Filed 02/16/2006 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JUSTIN R. HARRIS, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Respondents. : : : : : : : : : : Civil Action No. 05-323 (RBK) ORDER For the reasons expressed in the Court's Opinion filed herewith, It is on this 16th day of February , 2006, ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to RE-OPEN this matter; and it is further ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to amend his petition (Docket Entry No. 13) is construed as a motion for reconsideration, and reconsideration of this matter is hereby GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that this Court's October 6, 2005 Opinion and Order denying the writ in this matter (Docket Entry Nos. 11 and 12) are hereby VACATED; and it is further ORDERED that Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 is GRANTED to the following extent: IT IS ORDERED that this matter is referred to Respondents for prompt reconsideration, in good faith, of the appropriate CCC Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-00323-RBK Document 15 Filed 02/16/2006 Page 2 of 2 placement for Petitioner pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3621(b) and 3624(c), and it is further ORDERED that Respondents shall make findings and report the results of such consideration to this Court within fourteen (14) days after entry of this Order; and it is further ORDERED that, upon reviewing Respondents' report, this Court will determine what, if any, further relief is warranted. S/Robert B. Kugler ROBERT B. KUGLER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?