MATOS et al v. CITY OF CAMDEN - CITY HALL et al

Filing 77

ORDER denying Defendant City of Camden's 72 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 11/13/2009. (TH, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ENRIQUE MATOS and LINDA MATOS, Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 06-205-NLH-JS v. CITY OF CAMDEN, DETECTIVE MARSHALL MORGAN, and OFFICER LUIS SANCHEZ, Defendants.

ORDER

APPEARANCES: Thomas Bruno II, Esquire Abramson & Denenberg, PC 1315 Walnut Street, 12th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19107 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Ralph R. Kramer, Esquire 605 White Horse Pike Haddon Heights, NJ 08035 Attorney for Defendant Morgan John C. Eastlack, Jr., Esquire Holston, MacDonald, Uzdavinis & Ziegler, PC 66 Euclid Street PO Box 358 Woodbury, NJ 08096 Attorneys for Defendant Sanchez Frank A. Salvati, Esquire Office of City Attorney 4th Floor - City Hall Camden, NJ 08101 Attorneys for Defendant City of Camden

HILLMAN, District Judge THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon the motion for reconsideration filed by Defendant City of Camden; and The Court having conducted oral argument on the motion on November 12, 2009, during which it noted the appearances of Thomas Bruno, II, Esquire on behalf of Plaintiff Enrique Matos, John C. Eastlack, Jr., Esquire on behalf of Defendant Luis Sanchez, Ralph Kramer, Esquire on behalf of Defendant Marshall Morgan, and Frank A. Salvati, Esquire on behalf of CrossDefendant City of Camden; and For the reasons set forth on the record during oral argument, with the Court reserving the right to supplement its oral opinions with a written opinion at a later time pursuant to L. Civ. R. 52.1, and for good cause shown; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this 13th day of November , 2009,

that Defendant City of Camden's Motion for Reconsideration [72] is DENIED.

s/ Noel L. Hillman HON. NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J. At Camden, New Jersey

2