CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST v. THE COCA-COLA COMPANY et al

Filing 15

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, NESTLE USA, INC., BEVERAGE PARTNERS WORLDWIDE re 13 Joint MOTION to Dismiss, 14 Brief in Support of Motion, (Memorandum of Law) (FAULK, WARREN)

Download PDF
CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST v. THE COCA-COLA COMPANY et al Doc. 15 BROWN & CONNERY, LLP By: WARREN W. FAULK (0305) 360 Haddon Avenue P.O. Box 539 Westmont, NJ 08108 (856) 854-8900 (856) 858-4967 (fax) Attorneys for Defendants IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, Plaintiff, v. THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 1:07-cv-00-00539-RMB-JS Document Electronically Filed Return date: June 15, 2007 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I electronically filed with the Court the following documents: (1) Notice of Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss; (2) Memorandum of Law in support of same; (3) Proposed form of order; and this Certificate of Service. The foregoing documents have been served upon all counsel of record as listed on the docket of this Court via CM/ECF and served upon all the following parties via United States mail, postage prepaid: Mark R. Cuker, Esq. Williams, Cuker & Berezofsky Woodland Falls Corporate Center 210 Lake Drive East, Suite 101 Cherry Hill, NJ 08002-1163 Dockets.Justia.com Stephen Gardner, Esq. Center for Science in the Public Interest 5646 Milton Street, Suite 211 Dallas, TX 75206 BROWN & CONNERY, LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Coca-Cola Company, Nestle USA, Inc., and Beverage Partners Worldwide (North America) Dated: May 15, 2007 By: s/Warren W. Faulk WARREN W. FAULK (0305) 360 Haddon Avenue P.O. Box 539 Westmont, NJ 08108 (856) 854-8900 (856) 858-4967 (fax) wfaulk@brownconnery.com -2LEGAL02/30349676v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?