CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST v. THE COCA-COLA COMPANY et al

Filing 92

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider on 8/6/08. (jm1, )

Download PDF
CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST v. THE COCA-COLA COMPANY et al Doc. 92 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, FRANULOVIC, Plaintiffs, v. COCA-COLA COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 07-539 (RMB) CATHERINE M. MELFI, Plaintiff, Civil No. 07-828 (RMB) v. THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, Defendant. ADAM SIMMENS, Plaintiff, Civil No. 07-3855 (RMB) v. COCA-COLA COMPANY, Defendant. AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER This Scheduling Order confirms the directives given to counsel at the conference on August 5, 2008; and the Court noting that counsel for all parties appeared. IT IS this 6th day of August, 2008, hereby ORDERED: 1. By August 25, 2008, plaintiffs shall supplement their Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 disclosures and answers to interrogatories and document requests in accordance with the Court's rulings at the August 4, 2008 conference. 2. By September 30, plaintiffs' depositions. 2008, defendants shall complete Dockets.Justia.com 3. By October 21, 2008, plaintiffs shall file their Motion for Class Certification. 4. By November 11, 2008, defendants shall complete the depositions of plaintiffs' class certification experts. 5. By December 11, 2008, defendants shall file opposition to plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification. their the 6. By January 8, 2009, plaintiffs shall complete depositions of defendants' class certification experts. 7. By February 8, 2009, plaintiffs shall file their reply brief in support of their Motion for Class Certification. THE FAILURE OF A PARTY OR ATTORNEY TO OBEY THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 16(f). s/ Joel Schneider JOEL SCHNEIDER United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?