HAAS v. BURLINGTON COUNTY

Filing 448

ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 441 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part Class Counsels' Motions for Attorneys' Fees (Docket Nos. 364 and 366). Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 9/24/2019. (tf, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY TAMMY MARIE HAAS and CONRAD SZCZPANIAK, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, Civil No. 08-1102 (NLH/JS) ORDER v. BURLINGTON COUNTY, et al., Defendants. HILLMAN, District Judge For the reasons expressed in the Court’s Opinion filed today, IT IS on this 24th day of September , 2019 ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Schneider's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 441) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED Class Counsels’ 1 Motions for Attorneys’ Fees (Docket Nos. 364 and 366) be, and the same hereby are, GRANTED IN PART 1 There are two factions of class counsel involved in this case. The first group includes Attorneys Carl Poplar and William Riback (“Poplar Group”) while the second group includes Attorneys David Novack and Susan Lask (“Novack Group”). Collectively, the Court refers to these two groups as “Class Counsel[.]” and DENIED IN PART. The Court grants the applications for fees but allocates the fee in a manner consistent with the Report and Recommendation: $742,500 to the Poplar Group and $157,500 to the Novack Group. Costs are also apportioned consistent with the Report and Recommendation: $20,068.80 to the Poplar Group and $4,931.20 to the Novack Group. SO ORDERED. At Camden, New Jersey _s/ Noel L. Hillman_____ NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?