JACKSON v. GANNETT CO., INC.

Filing 32

ORDER granting in part and denying in part Deft's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. GRANTED as to Pltf's NJLAD hostile work environment claim, NJLAD retaliation claim, FMLA interference claim, and request for punitive damages under the FMLA; DENIED as to Pltf's NJLAD failure to accommodate claim, NJLAD termination claim, FMLA retaliation claim, and request for punitive damages under the NJLAD. Signed by Judge Joseph H. Rodriguez on 8/3/2011. (drw, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY __________________________ MILES E. JACKSON : Plaintiff, v. GANNETT CO., INC. d/b/a THE DAILY JOURNAL, : Hon. Joseph H. Rodriguez : Civil Action No. 08-6403 : ORDER : Defendants. ____________________________: This matter having come before the Court on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 [Dkt. No. 23]; and the Court having considered the written submissions of the parties; and the Court having heard oral argument on the motion on July 14, 2011; and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion issued on even date, IT IS on this 3rd day of August, 2011 hereby ORDERED as follows: Defendants’ motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; Defendants’ motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s NJLAD hostile work environment claim, NJLAD retaliation claim, FMLA interference claim, and request for punitive damages under the FMLA; and Defendants’ motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs’ NJLAD failure to accommodate claim, NJLAD termination claim, FMLA retaliation claim, and request for punitive damages under the NJLAD. /s/ Joseph H. Rodriguez Hon. Joseph H. Rodriguez, United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?