VARGAS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al

Filing 3

ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Petitioner's right to file a motion for relief from his federal conviction; ORDERED that IFP status is DISMISSED as moot; ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon Petitioner; ORDERED that Clerk is to close file without assessing any fees. Signed by Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 12/09/2009. (nz, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : Petitioner, : : v. : : STATE OF NEW JERSEY, et al., : : Respondents. : ________________________________: JOSE VARGAS, Civil Action No. 09-1219 (JBS) ORDER THIS MATTER having come before the Court by way of petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, on behalf of Petitioner Jose Vargas, and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion filed herewith, IT IS on this 9th day of December , 2009, ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Petitioner's right to file a motion for relief from his federal conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255; and it is further ORDERED that the motions for in forma pauperis status, for transfer to a federal detention center, for appointment of counsel, for issuance of a writ of error, for consolidation of the state and federal court criminal matters in this habeas petition, and for an Order to show cause, are DISMISSED as moot; ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon Petitioner by regular mail; and it is finally ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to close the file accordingly without assessing any fees or costs. s/ Jerome B. Simandle JEROME B. SIMANDLE United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?