MACWILLIAMS v. BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA INC.

Filing 36

ORDER granting in part and denying in part BP's 21 Motion for Summary Judgment. Motion for summary judgment dismissing Count 1 of Pltf.'s Amended Complaint is GRANTED; DENIED re. Pltf.'s breach-of-contract claim based on his unreturned $20,000 deposit; GRANTED re. Pltf.'s remaining breach-of-contract claims. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 11/23/2010. (drw, )

Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION (Doc. No. 21) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE ___________________________________ : : FRANK MacWILLIAMS (trading as Edgewater Park Amoco and Mac's : : Amoco), Civil No. 09-1844 (RBK/AMD) : : Plaintiff, : ORDER : v. : : BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA : INC., : : Defendant. ___________________________________ : THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon the motion of Defendant BP Products North America Inc. ("BP") for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiff Frank MacWilliams' Amended Complaint; and the Court having considered the parties' submissions: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Court's accompanying Opinion, BP's motion for summary judgment dismissing Count One of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is GRANTED; and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Court's accompanying Opinion, BP's motion for summary judgment is DENIED regarding Plaintiff's breach-ofcontract claim based on his unreturned $20,000 deposit; and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Court's accompanying Opinion, BP's motion for summary judgment regarding Plaintiff's remaining breach-of-contract claims is GRANTED. 1 Dated:11/18/10 /s/ Robert B. Kugler ROBERT B. KUGLER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?