SMITH et al v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
Filing
65
ORDER denying Pltf's 54 Motion in Limine; granting in part Defts' 56 Motion in Limine. The testimony of Pltfs' expert witness Timothy Longo is EXCLUDED. the Court reserves decision on the admissibility of the 911 call evidence. Trial will commence on 7/16/2013 @ 9:00 AM in Courtroom 4A. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 7/11/2013. (drw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
BEVERLY SMITH, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Civil Action
No. 09-4268 (JBS/KMW)
v.
ORDER
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, et al.,
Defendants.
This matter comes before the Court on two motions:
Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine to determine the permissibility and
scope of the testimony of Plaintiffs’ expert witness Timothy
Longo [Docket Item 54] and Defendants’ Motion in Limine to
preclude portions of Longo’s testimony and to admit a 911 call
log and tape related to this cause of action [Docket Item 56].
For the reasons explained in the Opinion of today’s date and for
good cause shown;
IT IS this
11th day of
July , 2013 hereby
ORDERED Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine [Docket Item 54] is
DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion in Limine [Docket Item 56]
is GRANTED in part; and it is further
ORDERED that the testimony of Plaintiffs’ expert witness
Timothy Longo is EXCLUDED; and it is further
ORDERED that the Court reserves decision on the
admissibility of the 911 call evidence; and it is further
ORDERED that trial will commence on Tuesday July 16th at
9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4A.
s/ Jerome B. Simandle
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Chief U.S. District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?