GLIELMI v. THE RAYMOND CORPORATION

Filing 41

ORDERED that Defts' 30 Motion for Summary Judgment re. Pltfs' expert is GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART. ORDERED that Defts' 32 Motion for Summary Judgment re. the legal duty owed to Pltfs is DENIED. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 3/19/2012. (drw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : : : : : ANTHONY GLIELMI and PATRICIA GLIELMI, Plaintiffs, v. THE RAYMOND CORPORATION and ARBOR MATERIAL HANDLING, INC. Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-5734 ORDER Appearances: GARY W. BOGUSKI TAYLOR & BOGUSKI LLC LARCHMONT LAW & PROFESSIONAL CENTER 199 SIXTH AVENUE P.O. BOX 227 MT. LAUREL, NJ 08054 ROBERT M. CAPLAN WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP 1650 MARKET STREET ONE LIBERTY PLACE, SUITE 1800 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 Attorneys for plaintiffs FRANCIS J. GREY , JR. WILLIAM J. RICCI LAVIN, COLEMAN, O’NEIL, RICCI, FINARELLI & GRAY, PC 1300 ROUTE 73 SUITE 307 MOUNT LAUREL, NJ 08054 Attorneys for defendants HILLMAN, District Judge For the reasons expressed in this Court’s Opinion entered today, it is this 19th day of March , 2012, hereby ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment [30] regarding plaintiffs’ expert is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; and it is further ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment regarding the legal duty owed to plaintiffs [32] is DENIED. s/Noel L. Hillman NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J. At Camden, New Jersey 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?