GLIELMI v. THE RAYMOND CORPORATION
Filing
41
ORDERED that Defts' 30 Motion for Summary Judgment re. Pltfs' expert is GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART. ORDERED that Defts' 32 Motion for Summary Judgment re. the legal duty owed to Pltfs is DENIED. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 3/19/2012. (drw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
ANTHONY GLIELMI and
PATRICIA GLIELMI,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE RAYMOND CORPORATION and
ARBOR MATERIAL HANDLING, INC.
Defendants.
Civil Action No.
09-5734
ORDER
Appearances:
GARY W. BOGUSKI
TAYLOR & BOGUSKI LLC
LARCHMONT LAW & PROFESSIONAL CENTER
199 SIXTH AVENUE
P.O. BOX 227
MT. LAUREL, NJ 08054
ROBERT M. CAPLAN
WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP
1650 MARKET STREET
ONE LIBERTY PLACE, SUITE 1800
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
Attorneys for plaintiffs
FRANCIS J. GREY , JR.
WILLIAM J. RICCI
LAVIN, COLEMAN, O’NEIL, RICCI, FINARELLI & GRAY, PC
1300 ROUTE 73
SUITE 307
MOUNT LAUREL, NJ 08054
Attorneys for defendants
HILLMAN, District Judge
For the reasons expressed in this Court’s Opinion
entered today, it is this
19th
day of
March , 2012, hereby
ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment
[30] regarding plaintiffs’ expert is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED
IN PART; and it is further
ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment
regarding the legal duty owed to plaintiffs [32] is DENIED.
s/Noel L. Hillman
NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J.
At Camden, New Jersey
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?