LOWE v. MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.

Filing 60

ORDERED that Deft's 52 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED with respect to Counts I and II & RESERVED as to Count III and Plaintiffs request for punitive damages, etc. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 4/27/2012. (drw)

Download PDF
[Dkt. Ent. 52] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE : : : : : : : : : : : : COALET LOWE, Plaintiff, v. MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS OF WILLINGBORO, LLC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 10-4823 (RMB/AMD) ORDER THIS MATTER coming before the Court upon a motion for summary judgment by Defendant; and THE COURT having considered the moving papers, as well as those submitted in opposition and reply, and all accompanying materials; and FOR THE REASONS set forth in the Opinion issued herewith, IT IS on this 27th day of April 2012, hereby ORDERED that the Court denies Defendant’s motion for summary judgment with respect to Counts I and II, and reserves on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to Count III and Plaintiff’s request for punitive damages; and it is further ORDERED that in the event Plaintiff chooses to pursue Claim 1 III, he shall file clarify the theory upon which he seeks to hold Medco liable for retaliation on or before May 11, 2012, and in the event Plaintiff does not file such a clarification, the Court shall deem this claim abandoned; and it is finally ORDERED that in the event Plaintiff pursues Claim III and submits such clarification, the parties shall file supplemental briefing identifying the relevant facts and the propriety of Medco’s liability on or before June 11, 2012. s/Renée Marie Bumb RENÉE MARIE BUMB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?