WARREN et al v. FISHER et al

Filing 118

ORDER denying the 101 Motion for Reconsideration; granting in part and denying in part 106 Motion to Amend; denying 100 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 12/20/2013. (drw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY THREASTON WARREN, JR., et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 10-5343 (JBS/KMW) v. ORDER ALBERT FISHER, III, et al., Defendants. This matter having come before the Court on a motion for reconsideration [Docket Item 101] and a motion to amend [Docket Item 106] brought by Plaintiffs Threaston Warren, Jr., Marjorie Warren, and Continental Aggregate Corp., LLC; and on the motion for attorneys’ fees [Docket Item 100] brought by Defendants Albert W. Fisher, III, Joseph J. Hannagan, Jr., and Robert Howell; for the reasons stated in the Opinion of today’s date; and for good cause shown; IT IS this 20th day of December , 2013 hereby ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is DENIED; and it further ORDERED that the motion to amend is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; amendment of Count 1 (class-of-one) and Count 2 (selective enforcement) is permitted on the grounds that Defendants subjected Plaintiffs to unequal treatment related to inspections of Plaintiffs’ property; amendment of Count 3 (conspiracy) is denied; amendment is permitted for claims against Defendants in their official capacities, as the Court makes no determination of whether Plaintiffs extinguished those claims in their settlement with the Township of Quinton; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall redact the proposed Third Amended Complaint to eliminate proposed claims that are denied above, and to present proposed claims that are granted above, and file the Third Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order; and it is further ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for attorneys’ fees is DENIED. s/ Jerome B. Simandle JEROME B. SIMANDLE Chief U.S. District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?