CATLETT v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al

Filing 31

ORDERED that Deft NJ STATE POLICE'S 8 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; Deft DISMISSED. ORDERED that Pltf's 14 Motion to Amend the Complaint is DENIED W/OUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a renewed motion, etc. ORDERED that Deft DIORIO'S 20 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 8/28/2012. (drw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY AMY K.Z. CATLETT, HON. JEROME B. SIMANDLE Plaintiff, Civil No. 12-153 (JBS/AMD) v. ORDER NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, et al., Defendants. This matter having come before the Court upon the motion of Defendant New Jersey State Police to dismiss and for summary judgment [Docket Item 8], the motion of Plaintiff for leave to file an amended complaint [Docket Item 14], and the motion of Defendant Diorio to dismiss [Docket Item 20]; the Court having considered the submissions of the parties; for the reasons explained in the Memorandum Opinion of today’s date; and for good cause shown; IT IS this 28th day of August, 2012 hereby ORDERED that the motion of Defendant New Jersey State Police [Docket Item 8] is GRANTED; the Court will dismiss Defendant New Jersey State Police from the action; and it is further ORDERED that the motion of Plaintiff for leave to file an amended complaint [Docket Item 14] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to filing a renewed motion for leave to file an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies identified in the accompanying Order of today’s date; and it is further ORDERED that the motion of Defendant Diorio to dismiss [Docket Item 20] is DENIED. s/ Jerome B. Simandle JEROME B. SIMANDLE Chief U.S. District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?