CATLETT v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
Filing
31
ORDERED that Deft NJ STATE POLICE'S 8 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; Deft DISMISSED. ORDERED that Pltf's 14 Motion to Amend the Complaint is DENIED W/OUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a renewed motion, etc. ORDERED that Deft DIORIO'S 20 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 8/28/2012. (drw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
AMY K.Z. CATLETT,
HON. JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Plaintiff,
Civil No. 12-153 (JBS/AMD)
v.
ORDER
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, et
al.,
Defendants.
This matter having come before the Court upon the motion of
Defendant New Jersey State Police to dismiss and for summary
judgment [Docket Item 8], the motion of Plaintiff for leave to
file an amended complaint [Docket Item 14], and the motion of
Defendant Diorio to dismiss [Docket Item 20]; the Court having
considered the submissions of the parties; for the reasons
explained in the Memorandum Opinion of today’s date; and for good
cause shown;
IT IS this
28th
day of August, 2012 hereby
ORDERED that the motion of Defendant New Jersey State Police
[Docket Item 8] is GRANTED; the Court will dismiss Defendant New
Jersey State Police from the action; and it is further
ORDERED that the motion of Plaintiff for leave to file an
amended complaint [Docket Item 14] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to
filing a renewed motion for leave to file an amended complaint
that cures the deficiencies identified in the accompanying Order
of today’s date; and it is further
ORDERED that the motion of Defendant Diorio to dismiss
[Docket Item 20] is DENIED.
s/ Jerome B. Simandle
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Chief U.S. District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?