CATLETT v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
Filing
55
ORDER granting and denying the 53 Motion to Amend. Defts VINELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT & VINELAND EMS are TERMINATED. Pltf shall prepare her AMENDED COMPLAINT in conformity w/ the directives in the Court's Opinion & Order & file same w/in 14 days. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 7/31/2013. (drw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
AMY K.Z. CATLETT,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action
No. 12-153 (JBS/JS)
v.
ORDER
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, et
al.,
Defendants.
This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff’s
motion to amend the complaint [Docket Item 53]; the Court having
considered the parties’ submissions; for the reasons explained
in the Opinion of today’s date; and for good cause shown;
IT IS, this
31st
day of
July
, 2013 hereby
ORDERED that the motion to amend is DENIED as to all claims
arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the New Jersey Civil Rights
Act against Defendants Dominic Diorio, Diane Stavoli and South
Jersey Healthcare; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint is
DENIED as to all false imprisonment claims arising under 42
U.S.C. § 1983 and the New Jersey Civil Rights Act against
Defendants Vineland Police Department and Vineland EMS, and it
is further
ORDERED that the motion to amend is DENIED as to all New
Jersey state law claims against Defendants Vineland Police
Department and Vineland EMS; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to amend is GRANTED as to
all other claims in the Proposed Amended Complaint [Docket Item
53]; and it is further
ORDERED that Defendants Vineland Police Department and
Vineland EMS are terminated as parties in this matter; and it is
further
ORDERED that Plaintiff shall prepare her Amended Complaint
in conformity with the directives in the Court’s Opinion and
Order and file same with the Clerk of Court within 14 days of
the entry of this order.
s/ Jerome B. Simandle
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Chief U.S. District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?