HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION v. MEEHAN

Filing 9

ORDER granting 8 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Joseph E. Irenas on 4/18/2013. (dmr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION, HONORABLE JOSEPH E. IRENAS Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-6568 (JEI/KMW) v. Kathleen A. Meehan, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 8) Defendant. APPEARANCES: WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO., LPA Michael J. McCulley 325 Chestnut Street, Suite 501 Philadelphia, PA 19106 Counsel for Plaintiff IRENAS, Senior District Judge: This matter having appeared before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Dkt. No. 8); the Court having reviewed the motion; and it appearing that: 1. On October 24, 1992, Defendant, Kathleen Meehan, signed a promissory note (“Note”) for the sum of $6,000.00 pursuant to the United States Health Education Assistance Loan (HEAL) Program, 42. U.S.C. §§ 292—292p and 42 C.F.R. pt. 60. ¶ 5) (Compl. That sum was loaned and advanced to Defendant Meehan. 1 2. The Note was sold, transferred, and assigned to Plaintiff, HICA Education Loan Corporation, by the Student Loan Marketing Association (“SLMA”). and/or holder of the Note. 3. Thus Plaintiff is the owner (Id. ¶ 7) According to the Complaint, Defendant has failed to make payments due under the terms of the Note, nor has she repaid the amount due despite demand for payment. (Id. ¶ 8) As such, she has defaulted under the terms of the Note and in violation of the HEAL statutes and accompanying regulations. (Id. ¶ 10) 4. As of January 31, 2013, Defendant owed Plaintiff unpaid principal in the amount of $3,747.59, as well as accrued, unpaid interest in the amount of $126.02 and unpaid late fees in the amount of $6.80. Interest continues to accrue on the principal at a rate of $0.32 per day. 5. (Id. ¶ 8) Defendant was served a copy of the Summons and Complaint on October 23, 2012. (Dkt. No. 4) Defendant failed to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint pursuant to the Rules. 6. On or about February 21, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Request for Default pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). No. 6) (Dkt. The Clerk entered a Default on February 22, 2013. Plaintiff moved for judgment by default under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) on February 22, 2013. (Dkt. No. 8) 2 To date, Defendant has not made any attempt to contest the Motion for Default or respond in any way to the Summons and Complaint. 7. Plaintiff has provided a declaration stating that as of January 31, 2013, Defendant owed Plaintiff unpaid principal in the amount of $3,747.59; accrued, unpaid interest through that date in the amount of $126.02; and accrued, unpaid late charges in the amount of $6.80. (P.’s Ex. 1, Zimmerman Decl. ¶ 2) Interest has continued to accrues since that date at the rate of $0.32 per day. 8. (Id.) In total, Defendant owes Plaintiff $3,880.41, plus additional prejudgment interest from February 1, 2013 to date at the rate of $0.32 per day. 9. For the reasons given above, the Court will Grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment. And for good cause shown; IT IS on this 18th day of April, 2013, ORDERED THAT: (1) Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment is hereby GRANTED; (2) Monetary judgment is hereby AWARDED to Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $3,880.41, plus 3 prejudgment interest from February 1, 2013 through the date of this judgment; (3) Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order and accompanying Judgment on Defendant within seven (7) days; (4) This Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Order until the expiration of one year from the date hereof or such later date as may be ordered by the Court on motion of any party; (5) The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to CLOSE THIS FILE. /s/ Joseph E. Irenas_______ Joseph E. Irenas, S.U.S.D.J. 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?