CALLAWAY v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, plaintiff's claims against the Cumberland County Jail are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against Corizon Health Care and Dr. Lawrence Wynn are permitted to proceed, etc. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 9/26/14. (js)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
_________________________________________
OREADER CALLAWAY,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
Civ. No. 13-2296 (RBK) (JS)
:
v.
:
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
_________________________________________ :
Plaintiff is a pretrial detainee currently detained at the Cumberland County Jail in
Bridgeton, New Jersey. He is proceeding pro se with an amended civil rights complaint filed
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. At this time, the Court must review the amended complaint
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A to determine whether it should be dismissed as
frivolous or malicious, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or because it
seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from suit.
Plaintiff names three defendants in his amended complaint; (1) Cumberland County Jail;
(2) Corizon Health Care; and (3) Dr. Lawrence Wynn. The Cumberland County Jail is not a
proper defendant in this case as the jail is not a “person” subject to suit under § 1983. See
Parrish v. Ocean Cnty. Jail, No. 13-2020, 2013 WL 5554687, at *2 (D.N.J. Sept. 20, 2013)
(finding that Ocean County Jail is not a person subject to suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983) (citations
omitted); Ross v. Burlington Cnty. Jail, No. 12-338, 2013 WL 3514191, at *2 (D.N.J. July 11, 2013) (dismissing
claims against jail with prejudice as it is not a person subject to § 1983 liability) (citations
omitted); Ruiz v. Stills, No. 09-4259, 2012 WL 762166, at *4 (D.N.J. Mar. 7, 2012) (dismissing
Cumberland County Jail from lawsuit because it is not a person subject to § 1983 liability)
(citations omitted). Accordingly, the claims against the Cumberland County Jail will be
1
dismissed with prejudice as any potential amendment as to this particular defendant would be
futile.
The Court will permit plaintiff’s claims against Corizon Health Care and Dr. Wynn to
proceed past screening. The amended complaint does not merely allege a disagreement with the
medical treatment plaintiff is receiving at the Cumberland County Jail which would be
insufficient to state a § 1983 claim. See Lenhart v. Pennsylvania, 528 F. App’x 111, 115 (3d Cir.
2013) (per curiam) (stating that complaint that alleges physician was negligent in diagnosing and
treating a medical condition does not state a valid claim of medical mistreatment under § 1983
and that mere disagreement as to proper medical treatment does not support a § 1983 claim of
inadequate medical care). Instead, plaintiff alleges that there is a policy in place at the prison
such that the prison does not provide rehabilitation narcotic pain medication or MRIs to inmates.
See, e.g., Dickerson v. SCI Graterford, 453 F. App’x 134, 137 (3d Cir. 2011) (noting plaintiff
needed to allege facts to demonstrate a policy on the part of the prison health care services to
deny medical care) (citing Natale v. Camden Cnty. Corr. Facility, 318 F.3d 575, 583-84 (3d Cir.
2003)); Giamboi v. Prison Health Servs., Inc., No. 11-0159, 2011 WL 5322769, at *11 (M.D. Pa.
June 2, 2011) (finding plaintiff had stated a claim where he alleged a custom or policy to provide
the least amount of medical care possible and to not order MRIs even in situations in which there
are clinical symptoms which are not explained by other tests such as X-rays), report and
recommendation adopted by, 2011 WL 5244507 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 2, 2011). The Court finds that
while sparse, the allegations in the complaint allege a policy such that the complaint will be
permitted to proceed past screening with respect to Dr. Wynn and Corizon Health Care.
2
Accordingly, IT IS on this
26th, day of September, 2014,
ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against the Cumberland County Jail are dismissed with
prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and it is further
ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against Corizon Health Care and Dr. Lawrence Wynn
are permitted to proceed; and it is further
ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), the Clerk shall issue a summons and
the U.S. Marshal shall serve the summons and copies of the amended complaint and this Opinion
and Order upon defendants Corizon Health Care and Dr. Lawrence Wynn, with all costs
advanced by the United States; and it is further
ORDERED that pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2) defendants Corizon Health Care and
Wynn shall file and serve a responsive pleading within the time specified by FED. R. CIV. P. 12;
and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve the Opinion and Order on plaintiff by regular U.S.
Mail.
s/Robert B. Kugler
ROBERT B. KUGLER
United States District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?